[vbox-dev] What setextradata values are live in PEUL 3.2.4r62467
s_k_e_l
Chris.Binner at btinternet.com
Thu Jun 24 10:07:43 GMT 2010
>
> Hi folks,
> I'm posting here to check if the code in
>
http://www.virtualbox.org/browser/trunk/src/VBox/Devices/PC/DevPcBios.cppVBoxMan
> age is live and all the settings in
> /**
> 889 * @interface_method_impl{PDMDEVREG,pfnConstruct}
> 890 */
> 891 static DECLCALLBACK(int) pcbiosConstruct(PPDMDEVINS pDevIns, int
> iInstance, PCFGMNODE pCfg)
> 892 {
> are visible in the PEUL version?
>
> A more detailed overview (logs, xml, etc) of what I have tried is in
> post on community forums
> http://forums.virtualbox.org/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=32117
>
> I am trying to use
>
>
setextradata "pxe2" "VBoxInternal/Devices/pcbios/0/Config/DmiChassisAssetTag" "l
> oantag"
>
> from a windows XP host to a windows PE ( 6.1.7600 ) guest.
>
> I am having difficult querying it on a WinPE guest, the value appears to be
> accepted into the pxe2.xml and valid in the log but I am getting No Instance
(s)
> when I query it within the WinPE.
> Other queries work.
>
> C:\wmictests>wmic csproduct list brief
> Caption IdentifyingNumber Name Vendor Version
> real:Computer System Product R8PVHR0 7459VTT LENOVO ThinkPad X200
> vm: Computer System Product 0 VirtulaBox innotek GmbH 1.2
>
> C:\wmictests>wmic systemenclosure get smbiosassettag
> SMBIOSAssetTag
> Real: loankit
> V: No Instance(s) Available.
> (No systemenclosure values exist)
>
> I've looked at the source code (possibly not for this version).
> http://www.virtualbox.org/browser/trunk/src/VBox/Devices/PC/DevPcBios.cpp
> and the value (ChassisAssettag) I'm interested in seems to be exposed.
>
> I have read interesting diversions about BIOS addins in
> http://vbox.innotek.de/pipermail/vbox-dev/2008-May/000606.html
>
> I appreciate that this is in a grey area as far as a post on a dev list, but
a
> reply with a list of what setextradata values are available to set and read
> would be great. A pointer to the relevent code would be useful though I am
> unlikely at this point to do any development coding.
>
>
s_k_e_l <Chris.Binner at ...> writes:
is this the similar to the discussion
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.virtualbox.devel/2783
Where there was a comment by Frank Mehnert
--
No, for chassis there is currently a separate, disabled section.
See DevFwCommon.cpp line 650.
--
Sorry if I'm covering old ground.
If it is the same is there anyione working on enabling the section?
reards
s_k_e_l
More information about the vbox-dev
mailing list