#2828 closed enhancement (wontfix)
bug tracker lacks a Cc: list
Reported by: | ToddAndMargo | Owned by: | |
---|---|---|---|
Component: | other | Version: | VirtualBox 2.1.0 |
Keywords: | Cc: | ||
Guest type: | other | Host type: | other |
Description
Hi All,
It is a real pain in the neck that I can not sign up on a Cc: list to track a bug.
Please fix this as soon as possible. Letting me "Reply" to a bug posting but not letting me track the bug is OBNOXIOUS.
Many thanks, -T
Change History (4)
follow-up: 3 comment:1 by , 16 years ago
comment:2 by , 16 years ago
Resolution: | → wontfix |
---|---|
Status: | new → closed |
follow-up: 4 comment:3 by , 16 years ago
Replying to frank:
As soon as you attach a comment to a bug report you will receive E-mails with further comments of that report. If that does not work then something with your E-mail is wrong.
Well the eMail address is not wrong: I copies and pasted it to a different eMail account and was able to eMail myself.
But, it has occurred to me that the reason I am not getting you Cc:'s would be Verizon, which routinely blocks several of my user group mailings (openvpn-users@…, users@…, etc.). So I changed my eMail address to the one I use when Verizon is blocking me.
As some bug trackers do and some do not send you a Cc: for your own posting. I will not be able to tell if Verizon is the problem until someone posts on any of bugs I am "suppose" to be Cc: on. Anyone want to reply to this one as a test? You can call me an idiot of you like. :-)
-T
comment:4 by , 16 years ago
Replying to ToddAndMargo:
Anyone want to reply to this one as a test? You can call me an idiot of you like. :-)
Never mind. My Cc:'s are now coming through perfectly on my alternate (non-Verizon) account. Sorry I falsely accused you guys of not Cc:'ing.
-T
We will not make bigger changes to the trac system as this is not written by us. As soon as you attach a comment to a bug report you will receive E-mails with further comments of that report. If that does not work then something with your E-mail is wrong.