[vbox-dev] vbox is 2x slower than KVM? (according to Linux Format magizine)
Huihong Luo
huisinro at yahoo.com
Fri Feb 13 22:55:31 GMT 2009
The Feburary "Linux Format" magizine has a cover story "Virtualize Now". It goes recommending VirtualBox due to the many features from vbox. However, it has one sentence saying VirtualBox is about 50% of KVM's performance.
How could it be possible? considering the similar artichetures (both are using a kernel driver inside host OS). Is that the case if comparing vbox without enabling hardware VT to KVM (which works only on VT)?
Any thoughts?
Thanks,
Huihong
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.virtualbox.org/pipermail/vbox-dev/attachments/20090213/e244bef7/attachment.html>
More information about the vbox-dev
mailing list