#5787 closed defect (fixed)
High CPU load when perform specific task in XP guest -> fixed in SVN.
Reported by: | kidault | Owned by: | |
---|---|---|---|
Component: | network/NAT | Version: | VirtualBox 3.1.2 |
Keywords: | cpu load | Cc: | |
Guest type: | Windows | Host type: | Windows |
Description
hardware: dell D630, with 3G RAM host OS:Windows 7 pro guest OS:Windows XP sp3
I met this problem when I upgraded from 3.0.12 to 3.1.0 or 3.1.2.
I have been using the guest XP in the past year, without reinstall. First host OS is Vista, then the Win7. And I kept my virtualbox version as new as possible. Despite some minor problems, they worked perfectly.
When I upgrade from 3.0.12 to 3.1.0(including addition), it was ok at first. But, whenever I started up my MS word, opened some documents, edited for a while, the cpu ran to 100% in both guest and host, and wouldn't come back.
so, I rolled back to 3.0.12, It worked normally again, but MS office (including word and excel) lost response for a while during opening and saving action. I think it has something to do with the downgrade and shared folder, but it's not a very big problem.
Today, I upgrade to 3.1.2. The MS office seems ok. But, when I opened the IE6, and logged into my bank to check my balance. the CPU load ran to 100%, whenever I perform the same task(I have uploaded an pic to indicate the exact step causing the problem). The guest and host kept the 100% load for a long time. Sometime, the load will go back to normal, but the guset XP system become unstable, host is not affacted.
No matter I checked 3D and 2D acceleration or not, the result is the same. The problem has nothing to do with the guest window mode either.
Now, I think it maybe caused by the certification for the bank installed in the IE. Is it possible?
Attachments (3)
Change History (21)
by , 14 years ago
Attachment: | WorkXP-2009-12-18-12-37-59(High load).log added |
---|
follow-up: 2 comment:1 by , 14 years ago
some addition information for the WorkXP-2009-12-18-13-36-35.log
I waited 10 minutes, nothing happened. "00:07:07.797 Guest Log: VBOXNP: DLL unloaded." is the last during this period.
Then I opened the www.ccb.com in IE6. the line "00:13:42.870 PIT: mode=2 count=0x4ad (1197) - 996.81 Hz (ch=0)" added. I waited for about two minutes, nothing happened.
I logged into my bank account, ran through the routine, soon after I click the "check detail" button, the cpu load jumped.
by , 14 years ago
Attachment: | Clipboard03.png added |
---|
show the web page causing the high load problem
comment:2 by , 14 years ago
Replying to kidault:
some addition information for the WorkXP-2009-12-18-13-36-35.log
I waited 10 minutes, nothing happened. "00:07:07.797 Guest Log: VBOXNP: DLL unloaded." is the last during this period.
Then I opened the www.ccb.com in IE6. the line "00:13:42.870 PIT: mode=2 count=0x4ad (1197) - 996.81 Hz (ch=0)" added. I waited for about two minutes, nothing happened.
I logged into my bank account, ran through the routine, soon after I click the "check detail" button, the cpu load jumped.
Regarding networking does it change for you anything if you change NAT networking on bridged one?
follow-up: 4 comment:3 by , 14 years ago
The IE6 previously used the NAT to connect the Internet.
Now I uninstalled the guest addition, removed the NAT network card from VM setting. Setting up the IE6 in the guest XP using the http proxy on the host thorugh host-only adapter. The problem seems go away. I will reinstall the guest addition and try more time.
comment:4 by , 14 years ago
Replying to kidault:
The IE6 previously used the NAT to connect the Internet.
Now I uninstalled the guest addition, removed the NAT network card from VM setting. Setting up the IE6 in the guest XP using the http proxy on the host thorugh host-only adapter. The problem seems go away. I will reinstall the guest addition and try more time.
For switching from NAT to bridged, it isn't required any manipulation with additions. You just may choose the "Bridged Adapter" in the "Attached to:" in Network Adapter Settings. Could you please send me (vasily _dot_ levchenko _at_ Sun _dot_ COM) pcap file at the moment when CPU usage jump up (you may find useful last 4 steps)?
follow-up: 8 comment:5 by , 14 years ago
Component: | other → network/NAT |
---|
follow-up: 7 comment:6 by , 14 years ago
I'm Sorry.
But since it has something to do with my bank account, I think it's not security for me to send the packet logging file to someone else.
I will try some not so sensitive website late. If the same problem happene, I will send the file to you immediately.
comment:7 by , 14 years ago
Replying to kidault:
I'm Sorry.
But since it has something to do with my bank account, I think it's not security for me to send the packet logging file to someone else.
:). Well if connection is secured (e.g. SSL) it is rather secure. What I need to know if there is growing number of retransmits happens and if yes why happens.
I will try some not so sensitive website late. If the same problem happene, I will send the file to you immediately.
Ok, good.
follow-up: 9 comment:8 by , 14 years ago
Replying to Hachiman: Hello, I have sent the pcap file to you.
comment:9 by , 14 years ago
follow-up: 11 comment:10 by , 14 years ago
Get hint from this post http://forums.virtualbox.org/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=25930&start=30
tonny's suggestion solved the problem for me: "I've been experiencing high CPU loads as well, when using NAT networking (Windows 7 host with Windows XP guest). You should try and completely disable the Windows Firewall in the guest, that did the trick for me."
comment:11 by , 14 years ago
Replying to kidault:
Get hint from this post http://forums.virtualbox.org/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=25930&start=30
tonny's suggestion solved the problem for me: "I've been experiencing high CPU loads as well, when using NAT networking (Windows 7 host with Windows XP guest). You should try and completely disable the Windows Firewall in the guest, that did the trick for me."
thanks for update.
comment:12 by , 14 years ago
We been able reproduce the effect similar you've seen using NAT + Windows firewall. And get solution for our case.
Could you please evaluate thebuild if it solves fw problem for you?
comment:15 by , 14 years ago
It seems that the problem has been solved. Before installing the new version, I turned on the ICS in xp. The problem came back soon when I started the program previously causing the high cpu load. Now in the new version, I have run the same program with the ICS on for a while(about 30 minutes). All things runs smoothly now.
comment:17 by , 14 years ago
Summary: | High CPU load when perform specific task in XP guest → High CPU load when perform specific task in XP guest -> fixed in SVN. |
---|
comment:18 by , 14 years ago
Resolution: | → fixed |
---|---|
Status: | new → closed |
3.1.2 high cpu load 1st