VirtualBox

Opened 15 years ago

Last modified 14 years ago

#4934 reopened defect

Cannot start VM bridged to a VLANs when another VM bridged to another VLAN is already running

Reported by: Boris Owned by:
Component: network Version: VirtualBox 3.0.4
Keywords: VLAN, VERR_INTNET_INCOMPATIBLE_TRUNK Cc: 2.2.4 - 3.06 B1
Guest type: other Host type: Windows

Description

Cannot start VM bridged to a VLANs when another VM bridged to another VLAN is already running.

Windows Vista Business 64bit host SP2

I have 3 VLANs on an Intel PRO/1000 MT Desktop Adapter lan card. I have installed the Intel Proset drivers for the NIC v14.3 They enable me to have each VLAN with its own virtual NIC in the form of for example: Intel(R) PRO/1000 MT Desktop Adapter - VLAN : VLAN2018 (The only way to use VLAN in Windows I know of) If I start a virtual machine bridged to one of the Virtual VLAN NICs it is OK, everything is working I can also start more virtual machines bridged to the same Virtual VLAN NIC But the problem is when I try to start a virtual machine bridged to a different Virtual VLAN NIC,

while those VMs bridged to first Virtual VLAN NIC are still running.

I get a crash with message: VERR_INTNET_INCOMPATIBLE_TRUNK

I tried Virtual Box version 2.2.4-47978 and also latest beta 3.0.6_BETA1-51790 still the same The only difference is that 2.2.4 locks up hard after a couple of VLAN crashes and I need to reboot my host.

For example: start VM1 bridged to VLAN1 - OK start VM2 bridged to VLAN1 - OK start VM3 bridged to VLAN2 - CRASH!!!

Other example: start VM1 bridged to VLAN1 - OK start VM2 bridged to VLAN1 - OK stop VM1 and VM2 start VM3 bridged to VLAN2 - OK

Attachments (4)

RadostinYal LX Ubuntu 32-2009-09-08-23-57-18.log (30.0 KB ) - added by Boris 15 years ago.
One of the guests that fail. I have windowses that also fail
pfSense_hoved-2010-02-18-02-48-32.log (29.8 KB ) - added by Snorre Jensen 14 years ago.
VBox.log (33.3 KB ) - added by Jean-Baptiste Rouault 14 years ago.
VirtualBox 3.1.6 error on gentoo x86_64
virtualbox318-w7-64b-intel82567LM.log (32.8 KB ) - added by Markus 14 years ago.
VirtualBox 3.18 logfile

Download all attachments as: .zip

Change History (10)

by Boris, 15 years ago

One of the guests that fail. I have windowses that also fail

comment:1 by Boris, 15 years ago

This is caused by bug when comparing the network adapter names, for more details, see - http://forums.virtualbox.org/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=15238&p=97841

Please, fix that, it is important!

comment:2 by Sander van Leeuwen, 14 years ago

Resolution: fixed
Status: newclosed

Should be fixed. Please check 3.0.12 or 3.1.0.

by Snorre Jensen, 14 years ago

comment:3 by Snorre Jensen, 14 years ago

Resolution: fixed
Status: closedreopened

I have this issue in 3.1.4 on Debian squeeze amd64. see attachment

by Jean-Baptiste Rouault, 14 years ago

Attachment: VBox.log added

VirtualBox 3.1.6 error on gentoo x86_64

comment:4 by Jean-Baptiste Rouault, 14 years ago

I am experiencing the same issue with version 1.6.0 under Gentoo amd64, see attached log attachment:VBox.log

I tried with Ubuntu x86 and amd64 and could reproduce the bug only with the amd64 system.
This bug seems to happen when host interfaces names contains at least 14 characters, and all characters except the 13th are similar.

For example in the attached log the interfaces are named aaabbbccceeeff and aaabbbccceeegf and the guest machine doesn't start.
If the interfaces are named aaabbbccceeeff and aaabbbccceeefg it starts fine.

by Markus, 14 years ago

VirtualBox 3.18 logfile

comment:5 by Markus, 14 years ago

I'm experiencing the same bug with

  • VirtualBox 3.18
  • Windows 7 64bit
  • Intel 82567LM with two VLANs (100 & 110)

see log: attachment:virtualbox318-w7-64b-intel82567LM.log

The interfaces are (automatically) named
"Intel(R) 82567LM-3 Gigabit Network Connection - VLAN : 100" and
"Intel(R) 82567LM-3 Gigabit Network Connection - VLAN : 110". I'm able to start VM's configured with interfaces assigned to same VLAN only.
Adding a second virtual-NIC from the other VLAN - doesn't matter if it's 100 or 110 - fails with the dreaded "VERR_INTNET_INCOMPATIBLE_TRUNK" message.
I didn't want to hack the registry (see forum link), but bought a USB-Ethernet-Adapter for the time until this one's fixed...

comment:6 by Markus, 14 years ago

upgraded to 3.2, same issue... (okay not surprising as the changelog didn't mention a fix)

Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.

© 2023 Oracle
ContactPrivacy policyTerms of Use