Opened 16 years ago
Last modified 15 years ago
#4934 reopened defect
Cannot start VM bridged to a VLANs when another VM bridged to another VLAN is already running
Reported by: | Boris | Owned by: | |
---|---|---|---|
Component: | network | Version: | VirtualBox 3.0.4 |
Keywords: | VLAN, VERR_INTNET_INCOMPATIBLE_TRUNK | Cc: | 2.2.4 - 3.06 B1 |
Guest type: | other | Host type: | Windows |
Description
Cannot start VM bridged to a VLANs when another VM bridged to another VLAN is already running.
Windows Vista Business 64bit host SP2
I have 3 VLANs on an Intel PRO/1000 MT Desktop Adapter lan card. I have installed the Intel Proset drivers for the NIC v14.3 They enable me to have each VLAN with its own virtual NIC in the form of for example: Intel(R) PRO/1000 MT Desktop Adapter - VLAN : VLAN2018 (The only way to use VLAN in Windows I know of) If I start a virtual machine bridged to one of the Virtual VLAN NICs it is OK, everything is working I can also start more virtual machines bridged to the same Virtual VLAN NIC But the problem is when I try to start a virtual machine bridged to a different Virtual VLAN NIC,
while those VMs bridged to first Virtual VLAN NIC are still running.
I get a crash with message: VERR_INTNET_INCOMPATIBLE_TRUNK
I tried Virtual Box version 2.2.4-47978 and also latest beta 3.0.6_BETA1-51790 still the same The only difference is that 2.2.4 locks up hard after a couple of VLAN crashes and I need to reboot my host.
For example: start VM1 bridged to VLAN1 - OK start VM2 bridged to VLAN1 - OK start VM3 bridged to VLAN2 - CRASH!!!
Other example: start VM1 bridged to VLAN1 - OK start VM2 bridged to VLAN1 - OK stop VM1 and VM2 start VM3 bridged to VLAN2 - OK
Attachments (4)
Change History (10)
by , 16 years ago
Attachment: | RadostinYal LX Ubuntu 32-2009-09-08-23-57-18.log added |
---|
comment:1 by , 16 years ago
This is caused by bug when comparing the network adapter names, for more details, see - http://forums.virtualbox.org/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=15238&p=97841
Please, fix that, it is important!
comment:2 by , 15 years ago
Resolution: | → fixed |
---|---|
Status: | new → closed |
Should be fixed. Please check 3.0.12 or 3.1.0.
by , 15 years ago
Attachment: | pfSense_hoved-2010-02-18-02-48-32.log added |
---|
comment:3 by , 15 years ago
Resolution: | fixed |
---|---|
Status: | closed → reopened |
I have this issue in 3.1.4 on Debian squeeze amd64. see attachment
comment:4 by , 15 years ago
I am experiencing the same issue with version 1.6.0 under Gentoo amd64, see attached log attachment:VBox.log
I tried with Ubuntu x86 and amd64 and could reproduce the bug only with the amd64 system.
This bug seems to happen when host interfaces names contains at least 14 characters, and all characters except the 13th are similar.
For example in the attached log the interfaces are named aaabbbccceeeff and aaabbbccceeegf and the guest machine doesn't start.
If the interfaces are named aaabbbccceeeff and aaabbbccceeefg it starts fine.
comment:5 by , 15 years ago
I'm experiencing the same bug with
- VirtualBox 3.18
- Windows 7 64bit
- Intel 82567LM with two VLANs (100 & 110)
see log: attachment:virtualbox318-w7-64b-intel82567LM.log
The interfaces are (automatically) named
"Intel(R) 82567LM-3 Gigabit Network Connection - VLAN : 100" and
"Intel(R) 82567LM-3 Gigabit Network Connection - VLAN : 110". I'm able to start VM's configured with interfaces assigned to same VLAN only.
Adding a second virtual-NIC from the other VLAN - doesn't matter if it's 100 or 110 - fails with the dreaded "VERR_INTNET_INCOMPATIBLE_TRUNK" message.
I didn't want to hack the registry (see forum link), but bought a USB-Ethernet-Adapter for the time until this one's fixed...
comment:6 by , 15 years ago
upgraded to 3.2, same issue... (okay not surprising as the changelog didn't mention a fix)
One of the guests that fail. I have windowses that also fail