Opened 16 years ago
Closed 16 years ago
#3737 closed defect (duplicate)
Guest freezes, seems related to networ activity
Reported by: | Georg | Owned by: | |
---|---|---|---|
Component: | other | Version: | VirtualBox 2.2.0 |
Keywords: | Cc: | ||
Guest type: | other | Host type: | other |
Description
This might be related to bug #3676. I chose to create a new anyway. Hope that's OK. Feel free to merge/close.
After upgrading to 2.2.0-45846_Debian_lenny I can quite easily reproduce a complete lock up of the guest. The freeze seems to be related to heavy network usage, for example "aptitude safe-upgrade".
Host is fully updated Debian lenny/stable. Guest is Debian sid.
When the freeze happens there is no noticeable CPU-activity from VirtualBox. I attached gdb to the running process and got:
(gdb) where #0 0xb7f92424 in __kernel_vsyscall () #1 0xb7f6a025 in pthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.3.2 () from /lib/i686/cmov/libpthread.so.0 #2 0xb7a89c2c in VBoxNsprPR_WaitCondVar () from /usr/lib/virtualbox/VBoxXPCOM.so #3 0xb7a89cf9 in VBoxNsprPR_Wait () from /usr/lib/virtualbox/VBoxXPCOM.so #4 0xb7a78e46 in VBoxNsplPL_WaitForEvent () from /usr/lib/virtualbox/VBoxXPCOM.so #5 0xb7a7725f in ?? () from /usr/lib/virtualbox/VBoxXPCOM.so #6 0xb7f821ff in ?? () from /usr/lib/virtualbox/VBoxHeadless.so #7 0xb7f7f28c in TrustedMain () from /usr/lib/virtualbox/VBoxHeadless.so #8 0x08048dde in ?? () #9 0xb7d28455 in __libc_start_main () from /lib/i686/cmov/libc.so.6 #10 0x08048d01 in ?? () (gdb) info threads 20 Thread 0xb7c3bb90 (LWP 19179) 0xb7f92424 in __kernel_vsyscall () 19 Thread 0xb7984b90 (LWP 19180) 0xb7f92424 in __kernel_vsyscall () 18 Thread 0xb7779b90 (LWP 19181) 0xb7f92424 in __kernel_vsyscall () 17 Thread 0xb73b4b90 (LWP 19183) 0xb7f92424 in __kernel_vsyscall () 16 Thread 0xb7373b90 (LWP 19184) 0xb7f92424 in __kernel_vsyscall () 15 Thread 0xb751eb90 (LWP 19185) 0xb7f92424 in __kernel_vsyscall () 14 Thread 0xb7306b90 (LWP 19186) 0xb7f92424 in __kernel_vsyscall () 13 Thread 0xb6fffb90 (LWP 19187) 0xb7f92424 in __kernel_vsyscall () 12 Thread 0xb6e3fb90 (LWP 19188) 0xb7f92424 in __kernel_vsyscall () 11 Thread 0xb6db6b90 (LWP 19189) 0xb7f92424 in __kernel_vsyscall () 10 Thread 0xb57ffb90 (LWP 19190) 0xb7f92424 in __kernel_vsyscall () 9 Thread 0xb4cb4b90 (LWP 19191) 0xb7f92424 in __kernel_vsyscall () 8 Thread 0xb3b38b90 (LWP 19192) 0xb7f92424 in __kernel_vsyscall () 7 Thread 0xb3b17b90 (LWP 19193) 0xb7f92424 in __kernel_vsyscall () 6 Thread 0xb3ad6b90 (LWP 19194) 0xb7f92424 in __kernel_vsyscall () 5 Thread 0xb3a55b90 (LWP 19195) 0xb7f92424 in __kernel_vsyscall () 4 Thread 0xb3a24b90 (LWP 19196) 0xb7f92424 in __kernel_vsyscall () 3 Thread 0xb3943b90 (LWP 19197) 0xb7f92424 in __kernel_vsyscall () 2 Thread 0xb3922b90 (LWP 19198) 0xb7f92424 in __kernel_vsyscall () 1 Thread 0xb7cdd6c0 (LWP 19165) 0xb7f92424 in __kernel_vsyscall ()
It seems strange to me that every thread seems to be waiting in the same place but, I'm really no thread hacker so it might be OK.
I can supple a core file but it's rather huge...
Attaching VBox.log.
Please let me know if I can provide any more information!
Attachments (2)
Change History (6)
by , 16 years ago
Attachment: | VBox.2.log added |
---|
comment:1 by , 16 years ago
Replying to Ralfredo:
Attaching VBox.log.
It seems that I somehow managed to attach the same log twice. Sorry. Feel free to remove one. I don't think I can.
follow-up: 3 comment:2 by , 16 years ago
Ralfredo, please try to switch the virtual ethernet device from PCnet to E1000 for that VM and check if the problem persists. There is a potential problem with the PCnet device which will be fixed with the next release.
comment:3 by , 16 years ago
Replying to frank:
Ralfredo, please try to switch the virtual ethernet device from PCnet to E1000 for that VM and check if the problem persists.
WOW, that was fast response! Thanks!
I switched to "Intel PRO/1000 T Server" and the problems seems to be gone! It's obviously a little early to draw any conclusions about long time stability but something is definitely much butter. I have now used the NIC for at least 1000 times the data transfer than I could before.
Any chance a NIC switch could have any effect on #3735 or am I hoping for to much?
Once again thanks! If ever I got this kind of support when I pay for it...
comment:4 by , 16 years ago
Resolution: | → duplicate |
---|---|
Status: | new → closed |
Thanks for the feedback. I will close this bug as duplicate of #3676.
VBox.log