Opened 16 years ago
Closed 16 years ago
#2388 closed defect (fixed)
bug on webpage about forcing coredump
Reported by: | Korenberg Mark | Owned by: | |
---|---|---|---|
Component: | other | Version: | VirtualBox 2.0.2 |
Keywords: | Cc: | ||
Guest type: | other | Host type: | other |
Description
http://www.virtualbox.org/wiki/Core_dump
at the end of page:
"kill -4" is "kill -ILL", but not "kill -KILL"
There is typo on the page. So, change to "kill -9" or change to "kill -ILL". I think "-ILL" should be.
Change History (3)
follow-up: 2 comment:1 by , 16 years ago
Resolution: | → invalid |
---|---|
Status: | new → closed |
comment:2 by , 16 years ago
Resolution: | invalid |
---|---|
Status: | closed → reopened |
Replying to frank:
This is not a bug, this is by intension. If you kill a process with
kill -9
you wouldn't get a core dump.kill -4
(as if the application would have observed an illegal instruction) is more reliable. Note further that the VirtualBox applications override some signal handlers. Sokill -4
is fine.
Yes, but i mean that there is just typo ! Please correct the site.
Passing the signal number 4 (SIGKILL) is essential! The same applies to the alternative frontends VBoxHeadless and VBoxSDL. --- Should be replaced with
Passing the signal number 4 (SIGILL) is essential! The same applies to the alternative frontends VBoxHeadless and VBoxSDL. ---
comment:3 by , 16 years ago
Resolution: | → fixed |
---|---|
Status: | reopened → closed |
Oh, I'm very sorry that I misunderstood you! Thank you for this report. Fixed.
This is not a bug, this is by intension. If you kill a process with
kill -9
you wouldn't get a core dump.kill -4
(as if the application would have observed an illegal instruction) is more reliable. Note further that the VirtualBox applications override some signal handlers. Sokill -4
is fine.