VirtualBox

Changes between Version 1 and Version 2 of Ticket #21982, comment 4


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Feb 25, 2024 5:15:30 PM (3 months ago)
Author:
javispedro

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • Ticket #21982, comment 4

    v1 v2  
    1010However, I can't understand why the "new style .inf" works on 64-bit Vista. Maybe MS at some point added a compatibility shim that also loads per-manufacturer SoftwareSettings sections ?   Who knows.
    1111
    12 In any case: XP/w2003 64-bit versions also need a "old style INF", but I think this is just to fix this .SoftwareSettings issue (rather than due to not being able to understand 'NTx86' or commas or anything like that).
     12In any case: XP/w2003 64-bit versions also need a "old style INF", but I think this is just to fix this .SoftwareSettings issue (rather than due to XP not being able to understand 'NTx86' or commas or anything like that).
    1313
    14 I guess very likely that if we were to fix the .SoftwareSettings issue in the "new style INFs" then XP (both 32 & 64) could go back to using the "new style INF".
     14I guess very likely that if we were to fix the .SoftwareSettings issue in the "new style INFs" then XP (both 32 & 64) could go back to using the "new style INF". EDIT: Confirming: 32-bit XP can understand the "new style INF" just fine, but only if I rename the .SoftwareSettings section to VBoxVideo_Install.SoftwareSettings .

© 2023 Oracle
ContactPrivacy policyTerms of Use