[vbox-dev] Fwd: Announcement: VirtualBox 6.1.26 released

[Klaus Espenlaub]

inline...

On 2021-07-29 21:07, Larry Finger wrote:
> On 7/29/21 1:36 PM, Jose R R wrote:
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
>> From: *Jose R R* <jose.r.r at metztli.com <mailto:jose.r.r at metztli.com>>
>> Date: Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 11:00 AM
>> Subject: Re: [vbox-dev] Announcement: VirtualBox 6.1.26 released
>> To: Alexander Rudnev <alexander.rudnev at oracle.com 
>> <mailto:alexander.rudnev at oracle.com>>
>>
>>
>> Niltze [Hello]-
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 4:27 PM Alexander Rudnev 
>> <alexander.rudnev at oracle.com <mailto:alexander.rudnev at oracle.com>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> kmk build stopped at:
>>
>> kBuild: Compiling VBoxOGL2D - 
>> /usr/tzinti/build/VirtualBox-6.1.26/src/VBox/Frontends/VirtualBox/src/VBoxGLSupportInfo.cpp 
>>
>> /usr/tzinti/build/VirtualBox-6.1.26/src/VBox/Frontends/VirtualBox/src/VBoxGLSupportInfo.cpp:22:10: 
>> fatal error: QGLWidget: No such file or directory
>>   #include <QGLWidget>
>>            ^~~~~~~~~~~
>> compilation terminated.
>>
>> Please, see Bug#991635: FTBFS on amd64
>> < 
>> https://www.mail-archive.com/debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org/msg1812692.html 
>> <https://www.mail-archive.com/debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org/msg1812692.html> 
>> >

Yes, that's the symptom of the bug in the configure script which crept 
into 6.1.24 already which for on some (but not on all, thanks to 
different ordering in different Qt5 pkg-config files) Linux distros made 
it pick up the wrong include directory.

>> < 
>> https://www.mail-archive.com/debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org/msg1812703.html 
>> <https://www.mail-archive.com/debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org/msg1812703.html> 
>> >
>> but unable to find "6.1.26-2"
> 
> I see in the referenced bug tracker at Debian that this is fixed. Could 
> you please supply the fix here? I am seeing the same problem for 
> openSUSE Leap versions. Tumbleweed builds OK.
> 

Fix is applying https://www.virtualbox.org/changeset/90377/vbox?format=diff

Don't ask me why, but the Qt include ordering seems to be consistent 
between all popular deb and rpm based packages, which is why it went 
unnoticed for quite a while.

Klaus

> Thanks,
> 
> Larry