[vbox-dev] systemd usage incorrect
Neal Becker
ndbecker2 at gmail.com
Thu Dec 18 20:12:04 GMT 2014
Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Qui, 2014-12-18 at 07:19 -0500, Neal Becker wrote:
>> VirtualBox-4.3.20-1.fc21.x86_64
>>
>> I see VB installed into /etc/modules-load.d. These files should be installed
>> into /usr/lib/modules-load.d instead. According to manpage:
>>
>> '''
>> Each configuration file shall be named in the style of program.conf.
>> Files in /etc/ override files
>> with the same name in /usr/lib/ and /run/. Files in /run/ override
>> files
>> with the same name in
>> /usr/lib/. Packages should install their configuration files in
>> /usr/lib/, files in /etc/ are
>> reserved for the local administrator, who may use this logic to
>> override
>> the configuration files
>> installed from vendor packages.
>>
>> If the administrator wants to disable a configuration file supplied by
>> the vendor, the recommended
>> way is to place a symlink to /dev/null in /etc/modules-load.d/ bearing
>> the same filename.
>> '''
>
> Hi, I will see that, thanks to open the bug report on rpmfusion, but
> what is the importance of that ? for what ? To prioritize this
>
> Best regards
-Probably not a high priority. It would allow the systemd config files to work
as intended by the man page. Also, should be a simple enough change.
-
-- Those who don't understand recursion are doomed to repeat it
More information about the vbox-dev
mailing list