[vbox-dev] [PATCH] performance improvements for Solaris guest shared folders
Life is hard, and then you die
ronald at innovation.ch
Wed Nov 9 18:31:28 PST 2011
On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 02:05:50PM +0100, Ramshankar wrote:
> Thought I'd give a status update.
> I've integrated the following patches (with some minor
> changes/additions) after testing them out a bit.
> I'm giving more priority to the patches that address bugs. Patches
> that improve performance will also be integrated but after the
> bug-fix ones are done.
Thanks! I completely understand. As you've probably already figured
out, the above plus the vbox.dir-stat.patch and vbox.alloc-size.patch
are basically bug fixes; the vbox.pre-symlink-refactor.patch and
vbox.symlink.patch are an enhancement (i.e. symlink support); the rest
of the patches are purely performance and related refactoring.
> On 11/ 6/11 07:45 AM, Life is hard, and then you die wrote:
> >On Sat, Nov 05, 2011 at 04:29:32AM -0700, Life is hard, and then you die wrote:
> >>On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 10:45:16AM +0100, Frank Mehnert wrote:
> >>>On Sunday 16 January 2011 11:50:06 Life is hard, and then you die wrote:
> >>>>Attached are some patches to improve the performance of shared-folders
> >>>>in Solaris guests. Together they speed up things between 2 to 4 times:
> >>>>operations like untarring and deleting whole directory tree are
> >>>>typically 2 to 2.5 times faster, and when running builds that include
> >>>>things like building Solaris packages I see a speedup of 3 to almost 4.
> >>>>The bulk of the speedup comes from the second (file open) patch.
> >>>>These patches assume my previously sent patches have been applied.
> >>>>Licensed under MIT/public-domain.
> >>>Thank you very much for this code contribution! We will revise it a bit
> >>>later as our colleague which maintains this code is currently not
> >>I don't want to appear pushy, but since I've seen that some work has
> >>been done in recent weeks on the Solaris shared-folders code, I'm
> >>wondering if you might have time to review the patches. I rebased them
> >>onto svn rev 39192 (and updated to VB 4.1.6) and they appear to still
> >>work fine on Solaris 10u8 (after disabling the mmap support - see
> >>For your convenience I've attached the rebased patches (in the order
> >>they should be applied), though all in one email instead of spread
> >>over 4 separate emails like last Jan.
> >Argh! I just realized that the symlink deletion issue was fixed a
> >while ago, so the hack in vbox.symlink.patch is not necessary anymore
> >(yay!). Since updating this patch causes some subsequent patches to
> >not apply cleanly anymore, I'm just re-sending the full list of
> >patches (i.e. please ignore those I sent yesterday).
> > Cheers,
> > Ronald
More information about the vbox-dev